Tackling elite impunity in the EU. The Case for a European Court for White-Collar Crime

Keywords

White-Collar Crime
Public Sector Corruption
Elite Impunity
Judicial Accountability
Supranational Enforcement

How to Cite

Dragomir, A. (2025). Tackling elite impunity in the EU. The Case for a European Court for White-Collar Crime. Journal of Law and Corruption Review, 7, e091. https://doi.org/10.37497/CorruptionReview.7.2025.91

Abstract

This article explores whether the European Union requires a dedicated judicial mechanism to address grand corruption and white-collar crime involving public officials, particularly when national systems fail to prosecute due to political interference or structural weaknesses. Using doctrinal legal research, comparative analysis, and case studies from EU Member States, the paper identifies persistent enforcement gaps in the current multi-level anti-corruption architecture. Although institutions like the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) have improved coordination, they lack binding enforcement powers and cannot fully address entrenched impunity. Building on the principle of complementarity as defined in international criminal law, the paper proposes the establishment of a European Court for White-Collar Crime with jurisdiction to intervene only when domestic authorities are unwilling or unable to act. Such an institution would preserve Member State sovereignty while providing a neutral forum for independent investigations and prosecution. The proposed court could strengthen accountability, ensure legal consistency across the Union, and reinforce public trust in the rule of law.

https://doi.org/10.37497/CorruptionReview.7.2025.91

References

Bassiouni, M. Cherif (2011). International Criminal Law: Volume III. Leiden: Brill. Available at: https://brill.com/view/journals/icla/11/1/article-p180_7.xml

Baeckman, J. (2011). Janša v. Slovenia (Patria Case). Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20110626214300/http://www.sds.si/media/jansa.patria.baeckman.pdf (Accessed: 20 May 2025).

Bard, P. (2022). In courts we trust, or should we? Judicial independence as the precondition for the effectiveness of EU law. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eulj.12425 (Accessed: 12 May 2025).

Bergmar, N. (2014). ‘Demanding Accountability Where Accountability Is Due: A Functional Necessity Approach to Diplomatic Immunity Under the Vienna Convention’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 47(2), pp. 501–530. Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vjtl/vol47/iss2/3/

Bianchi, A. (2001). ‘Immunity versus Human Rights: The Pinochet Case’, European Journal of International Law, 10(2), pp. 237–277. Available at: http://www.ejil.org/pdfs/10/2/581.pdf

Carrera, S. and Mitsilegas, V. (eds.) (2017). Constitutionalising the Security Union: Effectiveness, Rule of Law and Rights in Countering Terrorism and Crime. Brussels: CEPS. Available at: https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/

constitutionalising-security-union-effectiveness-rule-law-and-rights-countering/ (Accessed: 13 June 2025).

Civil Law Convention on Corruption (1999). ETS No. 174. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list?module=treaty-detail&treatynum=174 (Accessed: 20 May 2025).

Consolidated Versions of the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (2016). Official Journal of the European Union, C 202, 7 June, pp. 1–388. Available at:

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=oj:JOC_2016_202_R_TOC

Council of Europe (1999). Criminal Law Convention on Corruption, ETS No. 173. Available at: https://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/-/council-of-europe-criminal-law-convention-on-corruption-ets-no-173-translations (Accessed: 20 May 2025).

Denza, E. (2016). Diplomatic Law: Commentary on the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/diplomatic-law-4e-9780198703969?cc=ro&lang=en&

El Zeidy, M.M. (2008). The Principle of Complementarity in International Criminal Law: Origin, Development and Practice. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. DOI: 10.1163/ej.9789004166936.i-368

European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) (2017). Press Release: Investigation Concerning EU Funds in Romania. Available at: https://anti-fraud.ec.europa.eu/olaf-and-you/report-fraud_en (Accessed: 20 May 2025).

European Commission (2023a). 2023 Rule of Law Report – The rule of law situation in the European Union, COM(2023) 800 final, Brussels. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52023DC0800 (Accessed: 20 May 2025).

European Commission (2023b). EPPO: Factsheet and Operational Scope. Brussels: European Commission. Available at: https://www.eppo.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2024-02/EPPO_Annual_Report_2023.pdf

Eurojust (2022). Annual Report 2022: Chapter on Cross-border Corruption Cases. The Hague: Eurojust. Available at: https://eucrim.eu/news/eurojust-annual-report-2022-criminal-justice-across-borders/

European Parliament Research Service (EPRS) (2022). Combating corruption in the European Union, Brussels: EPRS., Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2022)739241

Europol (2025). Corruption. Available at: https://www.europol.europa.eu/crime-areas-and-statistics/crime-areas/corruption (Accessed: 20 May 2025).

Farhangi, L. (1986). ‘Insuring against abuse of diplomatic immunity’, Stanford Law Review, 38(6), pp. 1517–1548. Available at: https://bibliotekanauki.pl/articles/55995701

High Court of Cassation and Justice (Romania) (2019). Decision No. 142/2019, Criminal Section.

Hutchinson, T. and Duncan, N. (2012). ‘Defining and describing what we do: Doctrinal legal research’, Deakin Law Review, 17(1), pp. 83–119. doi: 10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70.

INTERPOL (2022). Financial Crime and Anti-Corruption Centre (IFCACC): Strategic Priorities and Action Plan.

Interpol (2025). Anti-Corruption and Asset Recovery. Available at: https://www.interpol.int/en/Crimes/Corruption/Anti-corruption-and-asset-recovery (Accessed: 20 May 2025).

International Court of Justice (ICJ) (2002). Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000 (Democratic Republic of Congo v. Belgium), Judgment of 14 February 2002, ICJ Reports 2002. Available at: www.icj-cij.org (Accessed: 24 May 2025).

Kochenov, D. (2015). EU Rule of Law: A Crisis of Legitimacy. RECONNECT Working Paper., Available at: https://reconnect-europe.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/RECONNECT-KochenovBard-WP_27072018b.pdf

Le Monde (2021). Nicolas Sarkozy condamné pour corruption, 1 March. Available at: https://www.lemonde.fr/politique/article/2021/03/01/nicolas-sarkozy-condamne-a-trois-ans-de-prison-dont-un-an-ferme-dans-l-affaire-des-ecoutes_6071580_823448.html (Accessed: 13 June 2025).

Luchtman, M. and Vervaele, J.A.E. (2022). ‘Prosecution of cross-border crimes in the EU and the EPPO: Scope, Limits and Challenges’, European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 30(1), pp. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2017-015

OECD (n.d.). Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/daf/anti-bribery/ConvCombatBribery_ENG.pdf (Accessed: 20 May 2025).

OECD (2023). Phase 4 Monitoring Reports of the Anti-Bribery Convention. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/daf/anti-bribery/ (Accessed: 20 May 2025).

RISE Project & Folha de São Paulo (2018). Dragnea’s Brazilian Connection. Investigative Report. Available at: https://www.riseproject.ro/liviu-dragnea-anchetat-in-brazilia-pentru-portocale/?tztc=2 (Accessed: 12 May 2025).

Silva, A. (2023). ‘Protection of Whistleblowers in the European Union: A Brief Analysis’, Corruption Review, 5, e072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37497/CorruptionReview.5.2023.72. Available at: https://corruptionreview.org/revista/article/view/72

Stahn, C. (2005). ‘Complementarity, Amnesties and Alternative Forms of Justice: Some Interpretative Guidelines for the International Criminal Court’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 3(3), pp. 695–720. doi:10.1093/jicj/mqi063.

Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=915730 (Accessed: 12 June 2025).

Szarek-Mason, P. (2010). The European Union's Fight Against Corruption: The Evolving Policy Towards Member States and Candidate Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511676086 (Accessed: 12 June 2025).

Transparency International (2023). The Ignored Threat: High-Level Corruption and Its Consequences in the EU. Berlin: Transparency International Secretariat. Available at: https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023 (Accessed: 16 June 2025).

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) (2020). Grand Corruption: The International Dimensions of Corruption. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. Available at: https://www.unodc.org/documents/brussels/UN_Convention_Against_Corruption.pdf (Accessed: 13 June 2025).

UNCAC Coalition (2022). The Way Forward: Strengthening the UNCAC Implementation Review Mechanism. Available at: https://uncaccoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Final-IRM-Report-September-2022.pdf (Accessed: 13 June 2025).

Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961). Opened for signature 18 April 1961, 23 U.S.T. 3227, T. Available at: https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/9_1_1961.pdf (Accessed: 18 May 2025).

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Andreea Dragomir

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.