Procurement fraud research landscape : A bibliometric Analysis

Palavras-chave

procurement fraud
bibliometric analysis
science mapping
corruption

Como Citar

Moyo, R., Kebaetse, T., & Matlhabaphiri, A. (2025). Procurement fraud research landscape : A bibliometric Analysis. Revista De Direito E Análise Da Corrupção, 7, e087. https://doi.org/10.37497/CorruptionReview.7.2025.87

Resumo

Purpose: The aim of the study was to review the bibliometric and intellectual structure of procurement fraud using science mapping review technique.

Methodology: The study adopted a bibliometric methodology that utilises the quantitative techniques on bibliometric data. The study applied bibliometric analysis because of its ability to summarise the intellectual structure of procurement fraud globally from a pool of voluminous data. The bibliometric data was retrieved from Scopus database due to its credibility founded on large volumes of peer reviewed publications. We performed science mapping analysis to understand  the structural and intellectual connections in procurement fraud through citation, co-citation, co-occurrence, and bibliographic coupling technique. Within the scientific mapping analysis, VOSviewer version 1.6.20 was used. These techniques were done combined with network visualisation to present the bibliometric and the intellectual structure of procurement fraud.

Findings:  Procurement fraud finds its residence in every stage of the procurement life cycle. There is no universal glue on the concept of procurement fraud. Most studies on procurement fraud are skewed towards the public sector globally. There is dearth of literature on procurement fraud in the private sector.The key emerging themes in procurement fraud bibliometric data are public procurement fraud, corruption, fraud in construction projects, collusion, forgery, bribery, application of AI to deter procurement fraud and procurement processes lacking auditability. The  Journal of Public Procurement and Critical perspectives on Accounting present the highest number of publications and have the highest total link strength. Most studies on procurement fraud are from United States of America with a high total link strength followed by Australia. There are few studies on the African continent. There are social linkages among authors within different institutions in United States of America, Indonesia and Australia.

Originality or Value:  There is growing trend on procurement fraud research but due to the differing synonyms that are used in describing procurement fraud research has been sparse. The study is a pioneering work on understanding the intellectual structure and knowledge base of procurement fraud. This study may be used as anchor on future studies in examining the scale of the differing manifestations of procurement fraud in the private sector. Policymakers can establish and implement frameworks that deter procurement fraud both in public and private sector.

https://doi.org/10.37497/CorruptionReview.7.2025.87

Referências

Abdollahi, A., Sadeghvaziri, F. and Rejeb, A. (2023) ‘Exploring the role of blockchain technology in value creation: a multiple case study approach’, Quality & Quantity, 57(1), pp. 427–451. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01348-2.

Akokuwebe, M.E. and Idemudia, E.S. (2023) ‘Fraud within the Nigerian health system, a double threat for resilience of a health system and the response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a review’, Pan African Medical Journal, 45. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2023.45.116.36979.

Alsamarraie, M.M. and Ghazali, F.E.M. (2023) ‘Barriers and Challenges for Public Procurement Integrity in Iraq: Systematic Review Study’, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 27(9), pp. 3633–3645. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-023-1196-4.

Araújo, A.G., Pereira Carneiro, A.M. and Palha, R.P. (2020) ‘Sustainable construction management: A systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, p. 120350. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120350.

Arora, S.D. and Chakraborty, A. (2021) ‘Intellectual structure of consumer complaining behavior (CCB) research: A bibliometric analysis’, Journal of Business Research, 122, pp. 60–74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.043.

Barajei, C. et al. (2023) ‘Exploring the anti‐corruption abilities of e‐procurement in Ghanaian mining companies’, THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 89(6), p. e12288. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12288.

Coleman, C.E., Mwanaumo, E.M. and Rahman, R.A. (2023) ‘Indicators of failing projects: The case of public construction’, in. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS: ICMEMS2022, Chennai, India, p. 030009. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0112018.

Dhurandhar, A. et al. (2015) ‘Robust System for Identifying Procurement Fraud’, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 29(2), pp. 3896–3903. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v29i2.19045.

Donthu, N. et al. (2021) ‘How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines’, Journal of Business Research, 133, pp. 285–296. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.

Ezeji, C.L. (2024) ‘Artificial Intelligence for detecting and preventing procurement fraud’, International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), 6(1), pp. 63–73. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v6i1.477.

Jain, J. et al. (2022) ‘Mapping the field of behavioural biases: a literature review using bibliometric analysis’, Management Review Quarterly, 72(3), pp. 823–855. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00215-y.

Kohler, J.C. and Dimancesco, D. (2020) ‘The risk of corruption in public pharmaceutical procurement: how anti-corruption, transparency and accountability measures may reduce this risk’, Global Health Action, 13(sup1), p. 1694745. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2019.1694745.

Lopes, A.D.O. and Andrade, M. (2022) ‘Fighting Corruption in Public Works: The Use of Cost Engineering in Criminal Investigation’, Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 14(3), p. 04522014. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000548.

Lyra, M.S. et al. (2022) ‘Fraud, corruption, and collusion in public procurement activities, a systematic literature review on data-driven methods’, Applied Network Science, 7(1), p. 83. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-022-00523-6.

Lyra, M.S., Pinheiro, F.L. and Bacao, F. (2022) ‘Public Procurement Fraud Detection: A Review Using Network Analysis’, in R.M. Benito et al. (eds) Complex Networks & Their Applications X. Cham: Springer International Publishing (Studies in Computational Intelligence), pp. 116–129. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93409-5_11.

Mircea, M., Stoica, M. and Ghilic-Micu, B. (2022) ‘Analysis of the Impact of Blockchain and Internet of Things (BIoT) on Public Procurement’, IEEE Access, 10, pp. 63353–63374. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3182656.

Murray, J.G. (2014) ‘Procurement Fraud Vulnerability: A Case Study’, EDPACS, 49(5), pp. 7–17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07366981.2014.920669.

N.A., K.S.A.A. (2021) ‘Exploring Public Procurement in Malaysia: How Institutional Arrangements Manufacture Fraudulent Practices’, International Journal of Procurement Management, 1(1), p. 1. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPM.2021.10041519.

Ndlovu, S.L. and Mutambara, E. (2023) ‘Manifestations of corruption within the Kwazulu-Natal municipalities: A thorn in the flesh’, Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review, 7(1), pp. 81–93. Available at: https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv7i1p8.

Nicolás-Carlock, J.R. and Luna-Pla, I. (2023) ‘Organized crime behavior of shell-company networks in procurement: prevention insights for policy and reform’, Trends in Organized Crime [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-023-09499-w.

Oliverio, W.F.M. et al. (2019) ‘A Hybrid Model for Fraud Detection on Purchase Orders’, in H. Yin et al. (eds) Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2019. Cham: Springer International Publishing (Lecture Notes in Computer Science), pp. 110–120. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33607-3_13.

Osei‐Tutu, E., Badu, E. and Owusu‐Manu, D. (2010) ‘Exploring corruption practices in public procurement of infrastructural projects in Ghana’, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3(2), pp. 236–256. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371011036563.

Piwowar-Sulej, K., Krzywonos, M. and Kwil, I. (2021) ‘Environmental entrepreneurship – Bibliometric and content analysis of the subject literature based on H-Core’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 295, p. 126277. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126277.

Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., Zailani, S.H.M., et al. (2022) ‘Knowledge Diffusion of the Internet of Things (IoT): A Main Path Analysis’, Wireless Personal Communications, 126(2), pp. 1177–1207. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-022-09787-8.

Rejeb, A., Rejeb, K., Abdollahi, A., et al. (2022) ‘The big picture on Instagram research: Insights from a bibliometric analysis’, Telematics and Informatics, 73, p. 101876. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2022.101876.

Rendon, J.M. and Rendon, R.G. (2016) ‘Procurement fraud in the US Department of Defense: Implications for contracting processes and internal controls’, Managerial Auditing Journal, 31(6/7), pp. 748–767. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-11-2015-1267.

Rustiarini, N.W. et al. (2019) ‘Why people commit public procurement fraud? The fraud diamond view’, Journal of Public Procurement, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-02-2019-0012.

Shi, J. et al. (2021) ‘A bibliometric analysis of global research output on network meta-analysis’, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 21(1), p. 144. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01470-5.

Signor, R., Love, P.E.D. and Ika, L.A. (2022) ‘White Collar Crime: Unearthing Collusion in the Procurement of Infrastructure Projects’, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69(5), pp. 1932–1943. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2020.2994636.

Smith, D. (2021) ‘Warning Signs (or Red Flags) of Fraud and Corruption in Procurement’, in Smith, D., Promoting Integrity in the Work of International Organisations. Cham: Springer International Publishing (Contributions to Finance and Accounting), pp. 103–106. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73916-4_10.

Syamsuddin et al. (2023) ‘Effect of Competence, Whistleblower, and Probity Audit on’, International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(4), p. e01525. Available at: https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i4.1525.

Taoufik, A.O. and Azmani, A. (2022) ‘Toward a Holistic Public Procurement 4.0. Case Study: Moroccan Public Procurement’, in M. Hamlich et al. (eds) Smart Applications and Data Analysis. Cham: Springer International Publishing (Communications in Computer and Information Science), pp. 104–114. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20490-6_9.

Velasco, R.B. et al. (2021) ‘A decision support system for fraud detection in public procurement’, International Transactions in Operational Research, 28(1), pp. 27–47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.12811.

Zainuldin, M.H. and Lui, T.K. (2022) ‘A bibliometric analysis of CSR in the banking industry: a decade study based on Scopus scientific mapping’, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(1), pp. 1–26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-04-2020-0178.

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Roland Moyo, Thato Kebaetse, Andrew Matlhabaphiri

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.